Then this weekend my highest rider score was 7 for effectiveness on a test that came out at 59%, in which we had a couple jigging steps in the free walk because I was pushing for a little more swing, and then grabbing the wrong lead because I thought I was setting the transition up in a clever way.
Also got a 5 and 5.5 for position with the comment that I'm collapsing left (a known flaw I've been working on), when I've always gotten a 6-7 even a few years ago when I know my position had more problems than currently. Do judges sometimes just fixate on a flaw (I know they're human, but I wonder what the judging guidance is on this)?
Help me understand!
