Tuffytown wrote:Have you seen the pussy hats? I don't think they are what you think they are. A bit of double entendre to the name.
Oh tbey were definitely what i thought theyvwere and worse.
Tuffytown wrote:Have you seen the pussy hats? I don't think they are what you think they are. A bit of double entendre to the name.
Chisamba wrote:Tuffytown wrote:Have you seen the pussy hats? I don't think they are what you think they are. A bit of double entendre to the name.
Oh tbey were definitely what i thought theyvwere and worse.
boots-aregard wrote:musical comedy wrote:Of course, nowadays, we can't be sure anything we read or see is accurate. I think though that there is enough evidence out there that Soros money is behind some of the demonstrations. I never said nor insinuated that anyone was 'manipulated' ( Tuffy) into marching. All these marches had to be organized by someone. Yours aregard was small as probably were many others. The big one in Washington didn't come together without some organizers. To dismiss that Soros is involved in the anti-Trump stuff is rather naive.
I dunno. Having ACTUALLY been involved in the organization of the marches in the bay area, where fundraising was a *real issue* and knowing many of the local donors, I happen to think that leaping on the Conspiracy! bandwagon is rather naive.
Chisamba wrote:Tuffytown wrote:Have you seen the pussy hats? I don't think they are what you think they are. A bit of double entendre to the name.
Oh tbey were definitely what i thought theyvwere and worse.
Who were the organizers of the California marches at the grass roots. Names, so that I can follow their contacts.boots-aregard wrote: At estimates from 225,000 to 300,000 people, I don't think "small" is the right adjective. Maybe Soros isn't fond of Californians and that might explain his absence.
Briarwood wrote:Kudos to Boots!
The closest march to me was 1 hour away. We had approx. 200 people and for this part of Illinois (Western IL, tri-state area; IL, IA, MO) I was surprised and pleased that we had that many. But every one counts!
Tuffytown wrote:This is so disgusting and shameful
Tuffytown wrote:This is so disgusting and shameful
Chancellor wrote:
Actually, I rather agree with Chisamba. Why call them pussy hats? I find that vulgar because of the double entendre. And you KNOW that the double entendre was deliberate
My bold. I'll take a guess. If anyone objects to the hats or the march, then they must be for Trump. Generally speaking, that is true. However, there are those, like you WMW, that did not support him, but still may not be in favor of the hats or other things from the left.WheresMyWhite wrote:Sitting here scratching my head. I must be under a bigger cabbage leaf than I though as I have no clue what is being alluded to here.
All I know is I didn't vote for him and I didn't support him and I still don't like the name...
musical comedy wrote:The litter thing: I wasn't there so I can't say who littered the most. StraightForward would have to produce more than a few signs on the ground for me to believe the Right to Life March littered more than the Women's March. With the wind, litter can fly out of trash cans. And yes, there are probably some unsavory (or trash if you choose) characters marching for Life too.
WheresMyWhite wrote:Sitting here scratching my head. I must be under a bigger cabbage leaf than I though as I have no clue what is being alluded to here.
All I know is I didn't vote for him and I didn't support him and I still don't like the name...
Tarlo Farm wrote:Chancellor wrote:
Actually, I rather agree with Chisamba. Why call them pussy hats? I find that vulgar because of the double entendre. And you KNOW that the double entendre was deliberate
Of course it was! And it's very interesting to see the people who supported trumplestiltskin and therefore his use of the word "pussy" while talking of committing sexual assault.
No money has come the way of anyone I know organizing and/or participating. I'm sure they'd like some.
Regarding the trash: http://www.snopes.com/2017/01/22/womens ... ped-signs/
WheresMyWhite wrote:Sitting here scratching my head. I must be under a bigger cabbage leaf than I though as I have no clue what is being alluded to here.
All I know is I didn't vote for him and I didn't support him and I still don't like the name...
Tuffytown wrote:Special snowflake is the insult directed at liberals, or really anyone, who objects or protests against the new administration. It was used pretty widely during the campaign period when the candidate would tweet out much of the crap he did and people would say it was offensive. It has become the standard from acolytes now that many are protesting as in "You libruls are a bunch of special snowflakes. He won, get over it and shut up".
boots-aregard wrote:Our final official tally was 38,000. Still chasing the food trucks for their contributions.
I love the comments on social media that attempt to diminish the marches with "Everybody went home feeling great and that's it. Nothing happened." For something that is only a week gone. We funnelled a lot of folks to other organizations with specific foci, and are now planning our next steps. There's talk of a scientists' march coming up, and there have been several demonstrations over the ill conceived airport bans of course.
History will eventually have its view.
Chancellor wrote:
There is a facebook meme going around that says that Trump got more women up and walking in one day than Michele Obama did the entire 8 years...
boots-aregard wrote:Chancellor wrote:
There is a facebook meme going around that says that Trump got more women up and walking in one day than Michele Obama did the entire 8 years...
Good thing you aren't running for office, Chancellor.
Return to “The Observation Lounge/ Cookbook Forum even Hot Topics”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 123 guests