Tsavo wrote:
If they would sell me a Lameness Locator (TM) we could settle this. But they won't.
Have them send me one too, will you? And I'd also like an xray machine, and will share it with all the other people I know who would like one, too.
Tsavo wrote:
If they would sell me a Lameness Locator (TM) we could settle this. But they won't.
kande50 wrote:Tsavo wrote:If a horse shows no sign of pain, how do you ever know if that horse is in pain?
We can't know even if he limps, because it could be a mechanical lameness that isn't painful.
kande50 wrote:Tsavo wrote:
If they would sell me a Lameness Locator (TM) we could settle this. But they won't.
Have them send me one too, will you? And I'd also like an xray machine, and will share it with all the other people I know who would like one, too.
Tsavo wrote:kande50 wrote:Tsavo wrote:
If they would sell me a Lameness Locator (TM) we could settle this. But they won't.
Have them send me one too, will you? And I'd also like an xray machine, and will share it with all the other people I know who would like one, too.
The lameness locator is completely different from an x-ray machine. There is no danger associated with reading output from two motion sensors like there is with dealing with ionizing radiation.
The reason they don't sell x-ray machines to the public does not apply to Lameness locators. Your comparison is irrelevant.
Tsavo wrote:The reason they don't sell x-ray machines to the public does not apply to Lameness locators. Your comparison is irrelevant.
Tsavo wrote:I explained this when you asked about it in the thread on the Lameness Locator.
Tsavo wrote:Which step of the baseline determination are you skeptical about and why?
kande50 wrote:I'm skeptical that they can come up with a baseline that they can then use to detect even very slight lamenesses.
I think they are looking at lameness that is obvious, not that it is 'signficant'. It it wasn't obvious or felt when riding, why would someone have a vet look at the horse? In other words, I don't think this is a tool to use just to see if a horse is showing the tinest bit of nqr. If it is, then I think most horses would show something. How many horses do you think move 100% perfect? From the little I read on this gadget, it is used in conjunction with nerve blocks, flexions, etc.kande50 wrote:I could see how it might be possible if they were looking at significant lamenesses, but if that was the case there would be no need for a lameness locator.
kande50 wrote:I don't see how it's possible to establish a baseline based on data from multiple horses and then use that baseline to sort out deviations that are of the same magnitude of, or less than, the ones included in the baseline.
musical comedy wrote:I think they are looking at lameness that is obvious, not that it is 'signficant'. It it wasn't obvious or felt when riding, why would someone have a vet look at the horse? In other words, I don't think this is a tool to use just to see if a horse is showing the tinest bit of nqr. If it is, then I think most horses would show something. How many horses do you think move 100% perfect? From the little I read on this gadget, it is used in conjunction with nerve blocks, flexions, etc.kande50 wrote:I could see how it might be possible if they were looking at significant lamenesses, but if that was the case there would be no need for a lameness locator.
I was surprised at the number of really respected vets that his this locator. It must be helpful. I am also suprised that no vets in my area have it, because this is a horse mecca with the USET close by and 3 surgical clinics.
Tsavo wrote:
Okay so you are using an argument from personal incredulity as opposed to a factually-based doubt about some technical aspect of the baseline determination method. Do I have that right?
Tsavo wrote:
I have been thinking about why they strictly limit sales to vets and will not sell to people who could test out so to speak IN THEIR SLEEP on the theory and operation (like anyone with a Masters or better in a hard science but also others). I think it is because it would be used to show most lameness treatments do not work as advertised.
Tsavo wrote:The downward transition is problematic... he will hang the leg and might even switch before trot. Then after the canter, he is not sound on that hind. So canter tweaks him.
kande50 wrote:Tsavo wrote:
Okay so you are using an argument from personal incredulity as opposed to a factually-based doubt about some technical aspect of the baseline determination method. Do I have that right?
Without the device and the manual I have no facts, so can't make factually based statements so can't argue anything. What I said was that I want one, or want access to one, so that I can see how it works.
Generally a lame hind leg is easy to diagnose with flexions and blocks. It's usually a hock or stifle and in your case I'm betting on stifle since hock injections didn't work. Could be bone or soft tissue.Tsavo wrote:I am getting the leg worked up next week. Anyone care to guess what the condition might be?
Did it occur to you that the hill work might be causing your problem?Tsavo wrote:I will be surprised if it is stifle (other than injury) given his ability to work on the hill. The stifle was visibly wonky all of a sudden 10 days ago. It is not a chronic thing.
khall wrote:Rye Tsavo does not believe in chiro or acupuncture. Thinks it's all woo woo and a waste of money along with injections, joint supplements.
musical comedy wrote:Did it occur to you that the hill work might be causing your problem?Tsavo wrote:I will be surprised if it is stifle (other than injury) given his ability to work on the hill. The stifle was visibly wonky all of a sudden 10 days ago. It is not a chronic thing.
Ryeissa wrote:Chiropractic is very good for treating hind end stuff, particularly stifles, in conjunction with other therapies. I've seen a lot of personal success.
Also head shaking syndrome but that's not relevant
kande50 wrote:Tsavo wrote:
I have been thinking about why they strictly limit sales to vets and will not sell to people who could test out so to speak IN THEIR SLEEP on the theory and operation (like anyone with a Masters or better in a hard science but also others). I think it is because it would be used to show most lameness treatments do not work as advertised.
Or, that the lameness locator doesn't work as advertised, so is just another woo woo device that unscrupulous vets can use to help them extract money from clients?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests